Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0vsCupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Formentor
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,521 kg3,353 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score51/100
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range785 km488 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 178hp133kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,521kg3,353lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.0s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 71.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.1s Calculated | 34.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t85kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 785km488mi Calculated | 688km427mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,297mm169in | 4,450mm175in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,528mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 4,750-5,500 rpm | 1,350-4,200 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.1 s | 34.1 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 178 hp 133 kW |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI has 12 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0 and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 7.3 s |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0 and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 113 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 785 km 488 mi |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 688 km 427 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 178 hp 133 kW | 7.3 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 113 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 178 hp 133 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 785 km 488 mi | 688 km 427 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0 | Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 97 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 49 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























