Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0vsAbarth Pulse 1.3 T270
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth Pulse
1.3 T270
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Lightest1,281 kg2,824 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 178hp133kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,281kg2,824lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 1,681kg3,706lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.0s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.1s Calculated | 38.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t85kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 785km488mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,297mm169in | 4,115mm162in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,544mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,532mm100in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,484mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | 188mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 370L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 4,750-5,500 rpm | 1,350-4,200 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 5,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.1 s | 38.2 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 178 hp 133 kW |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 has 2 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0 and Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 1,281 kg 2,824 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 7.3 s |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 7.6 s |
Although Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 has more power, Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0 and Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 113 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 178 hp 133 kW | 7.3 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 178 hp 133 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,281 kg 2,824 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 785 km 488 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 289 kg lighter
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























