Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsAbarth Pulse 1.3 T270
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth Pulse
1.3 T270
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270
- Lightest1,281 kg2,824 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,521kg3,353lb | 1,281kg2,824lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 1,681kg3,706lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.1s Calculated | 38.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km427mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,115mm162in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,528mm60in | 1,544mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,532mm100in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,484mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 188mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 370L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 47L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 5,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.1 s | 38.2 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 1,281 kg 2,824 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AbarthPulse1.3 T270 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | AbarthPulse1.3 T270 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb | 1,281 kg 2,824 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 427 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























