Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TDIvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
GLA 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.0 s
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,466 kg3,232 lb
- Best power-to-weight102 hp/t76 kW/t9.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range926 km575 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,466kg3,232lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 2,215kg4,883lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 90.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 65.6s Calculated | 70.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 926km575mi Calculated | 823km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,451mm175in | 4,412mm174in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,520mm60in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,679mm105in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,583mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 427L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,422L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 3,400-4,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 65.6 s | 70.0 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 9.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 926 km 575 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 823 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 926 km 575 mi | 823 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 174 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























