Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 220dvsCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range823 km511 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score90/100
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.9s Calculated | 40.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 823km511mi Calculated | 655km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,381mm172in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,544mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 427L | 485L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,422L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d: Power / Torque
- Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.9 s | 40.8 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 7.5 s |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 823 km 511 mi |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 655 km 407 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 823 km 511 mi | 655 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d | Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 168 km (104 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 58 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























