Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 S 3.0 V6vsCupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Ateca
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Lightest1,557 kg3,433 lb
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions168 g/km
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 S 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful354 hp264 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | CupraAteca2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354hp264kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 1,557kg3,433lb |
| Gross weight | 2,580kg5,688lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 57.2s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s Calculated | 18.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 730km454mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,696mm185in | 4,376mm172in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,615mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,631mm104in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,573mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 230mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 204g/km | 168g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | 5,400-6,400 rpm | 1,360-4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | CupraAteca2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 18.7 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 107 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 S 3.0 V6 has 54 hp more than Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 S 3.0 V6: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | 5.3 s |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 5.2 s |
Although Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 S 3.0 V6 has more power, Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 S 3.0 V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 S 3.0 V6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.3 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.2 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 S 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018S 3.0 V6 | CupraAteca2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp 264 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 730 km 454 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 204 g/km | 168 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 S 3.0 V6 | Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 S 3.0 V6
- Has 54 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
- Is 308 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 36 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























