Cupra Ateca
Car comparison
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI · Stage 3vsCupra Ateca 2.0 TSI · Stage 2vsCupra Ateca 2.0 TSI · Stage 1vsCupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Ateca
2.0 TSI (Stage 2)
Cupra Ateca
2.0 TSI (Stage 1)
Cupra Ateca
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 450 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed281 km/h175 mph
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,557 kg3,433 lb
- Best power-to-weight289 hp/t216 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions168 g/km
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW+150 hp | 390hp291kW+90 hp | 354hp264kW+54 hp | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft+220 Nm | 540Nm398lb-ft+140 Nm | 488Nm360lb-ft+88 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,557kg3,433lb | 1,557kg3,433lb | 1,557kg3,433lb | 1,557kg3,433lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | 259 km/h 161 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 44.3s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph-12.9 s Calculated | 48.6s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph-8.6 s Calculated | 51.7s99% target: 256 km/h / 159 mph-5.6 s Calculated | 57.2s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s-1.2 s | 4.4s-0.8 s | 4.7s-0.5 s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.7s-7.0 s Calculated | 13.8s-4.9 s Calculated | 15.4s-3.3 s Calculated | 18.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s-1.1 s Calculated | 4.2s-0.7 s Calculated | 4.5s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s-1.5 s Calculated | 12.4s-1.0 s Calculated | 12.7s-0.6 s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 289hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated | 250hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 398Nm/t266lb-ft/ton Calculated | 347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton Calculated | 313Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,376mm172in | 4,376mm172in | 4,376mm172in | 4,376mm172in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,841mm72in | 1,841mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,615mm64in | 1,615mm64in | 1,615mm64in | 1,615mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,631mm104in | 2,631mm104in | 2,631mm104in | 2,631mm104in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | 1,573mm62in | 1,573mm62in | 1,573mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,547mm61in | 1,547mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| CO2 emissions | 168g/km | 168g/km | 168g/km | 168g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 450 hp: Power / Torque
- Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 390 hp: Power / Torque
- Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 354 hp: Power / Torque
- Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI 300 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.2 s | 4.5 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.4 s | 4.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.7 s | 13.8 s | 15.4 s | 18.7 s |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | 259 km/h 161 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.2 s | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s | 10.7 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 12.4 s | 12.7 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 201 km/h 125 mph | 191 km/h 118 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | 450 hp 336 kW |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | 390 hp 291 kW |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | 354 hp 264 kW |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW |
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 450 hp has 150 hp more than Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI 300 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI 300 hp and Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 450 hp: 150 hp (112 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | 259 km/h 161 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | 4.0 s |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | 4.4 s |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | 4.7 s |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 450 hp and Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI 300 hp: 1.2 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 390 hp and Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 354 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | 250 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.0 s | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.4 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | 354 hp 264 kW | 4.7 s | 259 km/h 161 mph |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.2 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 450 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | 250 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 3)450 hp | CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 2)390 hp | CupraAteca2.0 TSI (Stage 1)354 hp | CupraAteca2.0 TSI300 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 390 hp 291 kW | 354 hp 264 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.4 s | 4.7 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | 259 km/h 161 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb | 1,557 kg 3,433 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 168 g/km | 168 g/km | 168 g/km | 168 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 250 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 450 hp | Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 390 hp | Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 354 hp | Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI 300 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 450 hp
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 390 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























