Car comparison

Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4vsChrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayman (987C)

S 3.4

295 hp3386 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2005-2009
VS

Chrysler Crossfire

SRT-6 3.2i V6

330 hp3199 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2004-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4

  • Fastest top speed
    285 km/h
    177 mph Unrestricted
    275 km/h
    171 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,350 kg
    2,976 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.6 L/100 km
    22.2 mpg US
    26.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.3 L/100 km
    15.4 mpg US
    18.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    254 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    604 km
    375 mi
  • Largest trunk
    260 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    36/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
Power
295hp220kW
330hp246kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,350kg2,976lb
1,455kg3,208lb
Gross weight
1,630kg3,594lb
1,755kg3,869lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Calculated
255 km/h
158 mph
To 99% top speed
92.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
63.4s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.4s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
18.6s
18.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.1s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.5s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
604km375mi
Calculated
545km339mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,386cc207cu in
3,199cc195cu in
Length
4,341mm171in
4,058mm160in
Width
1,801mm71in
1,766mm70in
Height
1,305mm51in
1,296mm51in
Wheelbase
2,415mm95in
2,400mm94in
Front track
1,486mm59in
1,493mm59in
Rear track
1,528mm60in
1,502mm59in
Ground clearance
121mm5in
-
Trunk volume
260L
215L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
64L
60L
CO2 emissions
254g/km
264g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
  • Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.46,250 rpm4,400-6,000 rpm7,300 rpm
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V66,100 rpm3,500 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.1 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.4 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.6 s
18.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Likely limited
255 km/h
158 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.4 s
11.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.5 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
172 km/h
107 mph
174 km/h
108 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
295 hp
220 kW
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
330 hp
246 kW

Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 has 35 hp more than Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 and Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
1,455 kg
3,208 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
255 km/h
158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.45.4 s
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V65.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
604 km
375 mi
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
545 km
339 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
295 hp
220 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
330 hp
246 kW
5.3 s
255 km/h
158 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
Power
295 hp
220 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,341 mm
170.9 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,058 mm
159.8 in
Height
1,296 mm
51.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
Power
295 hp
220 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
5.4 s
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
5.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6
Power
295 hp
220 kW
330 hp
246 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.4 s
5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
255 km/h
158 mph
Lightness
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
Fuel consumption
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,341 mm
170.9 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,058 mm
159.8 in
Height
1,296 mm
51.0 in
Range score
604 km
375 mi
545 km
339 mi
CO2 score
254 g/km
264 g/km
Trunk score
260 L
9.2 cu ft
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6
Consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.55 LC100 km19.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.85 LC100 mi30.98 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,783 LC/year2,888 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4

  • Is 105 kg lighter
  • Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 3.4
S 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4vsPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
SRT-6 3.2i V6
645Ci
VS
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6vsBMW6 Series (E63)645Ci
S 3.4
2.7
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4vsPorscheCayman (981C)2.7
SRT-6 3.2i V6
4.6 i V8 32V
VS
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6vsCadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V
S 3.4
Carrera 4 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4vsPorsche911 (996)Carrera 4 3.4
SRT-6 3.2i V6
M 3.2
VS
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6vsBMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2
S 3.4
3.5i V6 24V
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4vsNissan350Z (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V
SRT-6 3.2i V6
3.5 i V6 24V
VS
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6vsNissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V
S 3.4
4.2 V8
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8
SRT-6 3.2i V6
CSL 3.2i 24V
VS
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6vsBMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V
S 3.4
2.0
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4vsPorsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
SRT-6 3.2i V6
3.2
VS
ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6vsBMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 vs Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster