Cadillac XLR
Car comparison
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32VvsChrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChrysler Crossfire
SRT-6 3.2i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Most powerful330 hp246 kW
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions264 g/km
- Largest trunk215 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score34/100
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best estimated range553 km344 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 325hp242kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 63.4s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 553km344mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,565cc279cu in | 3,199cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,513mm178in | 4,058mm160in |
| Width | 1,836mm72in | 1,766mm70in |
| Height | 1,279mm50in | 1,296mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,685mm106in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,493mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,502mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 125L | 215L |
| Max trunk volume | 328L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 291g/km | 264g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW |
Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 has 5 hp more than Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V and Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 5.9 s |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 553 km 344 mi |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 325 hp 242 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 553 km 344 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 291 g/km | 264 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V | Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 km (5 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
- Emits 27 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























