Porsche Cayman (987C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4vsPorsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayman (981C)
2.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions195 g/km
- Best estimated range762 km473 mi
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful295 hp220 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight219 hp/t163 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 290Nm214lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,350kg2,976lb | 1,330kg2,932lb |
| Gross weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 73.3s99% target: 263 km/h / 164 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.6s | 19.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | 762km473mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,386cc207cu in | 2,706cc165cu in |
| Length | 4,341mm171in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,294mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | - |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | - |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 425L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 254g/km | 195g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 6,250 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.6 s | 19.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 171 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW |
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 has 20 hp more than Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 and Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 266 km/h 165 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 5.4 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 and Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 604 km 375 mi |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 762 km 473 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.7 s | 266 km/h 165 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | 266 km/h 165 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | 762 km 473 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 254 g/km | 195 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 | Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 158 km (98 mi) more estimated range
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
- Emits 59 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























