Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0vsChevrolet Equinox III 550T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018

2.0

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Chevrolet Equinox III

550T

260 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    802 km
    499 mi
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0ChevroletEquinox III550T
Power
245hp183kW
260hp194kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,710kg3,770lb
Gross weight
2,510kg5,534lb
-
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
78.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
80.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
32.4s
Calculated
38.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
802km499mi
Calculated
711km442mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,696mm185in
4,652mm183in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,843mm73in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,693mm67in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,725mm107in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,573mm62in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance
205mm8in
-
Trunk volume
500L
431L
Max trunk volume
1,500L
1,505L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
59L
CO2 emissions
185g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Chevrolet Equinox III 550TPowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.05,000-6,750 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,000 rpm
ChevroletEquinox III550T5,500 rpm2,000-5,300 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0ChevroletEquinox III550T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.4 s
38.0 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
147 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
ChevroletEquinox III550T
260 hp
194 kW

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has 15 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
ChevroletEquinox III550T
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
ChevroletEquinox III550T
1,710 kg
3,770 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
225 km/h
140 mph
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.06.7 s
ChevroletEquinox III550T7.8 s

Although Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
ChevroletEquinox III550T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
ChevroletEquinox III550T
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
802 km
499 mi
ChevroletEquinox III550T
711 km
442 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
6.7 s
225 km/h
140 mph
ChevroletEquinox III550T
260 hp
194 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
431 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,652 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.7 s
ChevroletEquinox III550T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
ChevroletEquinox III550T
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0ChevroletEquinox III550T
Power
245 hp
183 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
431 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,652 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Range score
802 km
499 mi
711 km
442 mi
CO2 score
185 g/km
-
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
431 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Has 17 Nm more
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 69 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 85 kg lighter
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
550T
650T
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
550T
2.0 T5
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
550T
2.0 T5
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0
45 TFSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
550T
25t
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
550T
2.0 P250
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
550T
30d
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsBMWX7 (G07)30d
2.0
2.0 T5
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0 vs Chevrolet Equinox III 550T - car comparison - FastVsFaster