Chevrolet Equinox III
Car comparison
Chevrolet Equinox III 550TvsLexus LX III · Facelift 2015 450d V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus LX III · Facelift 2015
450d V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score85/100
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Best estimated range979 km608 mi
- Largest trunk701 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best practicality score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletEquinox III550T | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 353Nm260lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 2,840kg6,261lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,350kg7,385lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 126.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 53.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | 979km608mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 4,461cc272cu in |
| Length | 4,652mm183in | 5,065mm199in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,980mm78in |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,910mm75in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,635mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 225mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 431L | 701L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,505L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 93L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 250g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: Power / Torque
- Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-5,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 3,600 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 3,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletEquinox III550T | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 53.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8 has 12 hp more than Chevrolet Equinox III 550T.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 2,840 kg 6,261 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 7.8 s |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 8.6 s |
Although Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8 has more power, Chevrolet Equinox III 550T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 711 km 442 mi |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 979 km 608 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 272 hp 203 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletEquinox III550T | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 2,840 kg 6,261 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | 979 km 608 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 250 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 431 L 15.2 cu ft | 701 L 24.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Equinox III 550T | Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Is 1,130 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 56 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 450d V8
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 297 Nm more
- Has 268 km (167 mi) more estimated range
- Has 270 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























