Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6)
Car comparison
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8vsWiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF4
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8
- Most powerful407 hp304 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight280 hp/t209 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best performance score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 405hp302kW | 407hp304kW |
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.1s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 61.2s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.4s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 272hp/t203kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 364Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated | 412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 569km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,967cc364cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,435mm175in | 4,230mm167in |
| Width | 1,844mm73in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,246mm49in | 1,190mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,686mm106in | 2,507mm99in |
| Front track | 1,577mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 144L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 295L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 285g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.4 s | 13.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 122 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 407 hp 304 kW |
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 has 2 hp more than Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8 and Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 4.2 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 4.6 s |
Although Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 has more power, Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8 and Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 407 hp 304 kW | 4.6 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 405 hp 302 kW | 407 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 569 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 285 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 144 L 5.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 57 Nm more
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























