Porsche 718 Boxster (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0vsChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Best power-to-weight220 hp/t164 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score85/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk206 L
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,636kg3,607lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 98.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 89.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.1s | 24.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,988cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,784mm188in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,897mm75in |
| Height | 1,281mm50in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,811mm111in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,532mm60in | 1,618mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 125L | 206L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 185g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,150-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.1 s | 24.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW |
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0 has 25 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 4.9 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 185 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | 206 L 7.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0
- Has 25 hp more
- Is 271 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 52 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 81 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























