Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 TvsMini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Convertible (F67)
JCW 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t125 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk206 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,636kg3,607lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,845kg4,068lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 87.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.9s Calculated | 26.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 620km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 3,879mm153in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,744mm69in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,431mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,811mm111in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,499mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | 1,499mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 206L | 160L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 215L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 44L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: Power / Torque
- Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.9 s | 26.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW |
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T has 44 hp more than Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 44 hp (33 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb |
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 6.1 s |
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 620 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 206 L 7.3 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Has 44 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 46 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0
- Is 211 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























