Jaguar F-type Convertible · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar F-type Convertible · Facelift 2020 2.0vsChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk233 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score85/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,636kg3,607lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 89.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.5s Calculated | 24.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 778km483mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,470mm176in | 4,784mm188in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,897mm75in |
| Height | 1,307mm51in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,622mm103in | 2,811mm111in |
| Front track | 1,596mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,647mm65in | 1,618mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 233L | 206L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 184g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 2.0: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.5 s | 24.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW |
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 2.0 has 25 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 2.0: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 | 5.7 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 778 km 483 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 184 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | 206 L 7.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2020 2.0
- Has 25 hp more
- Is 96 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























