TVR Griffith
Car comparison
TVR Griffith 5.0vsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Z28 5.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Griffith 5.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed271 km/h168 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque481 Nm355 lb-ft
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight321 hp/t239 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score75/100
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TVRGriffith5.0 | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 481Nm355lb-ft | 472Nm348lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,060kg2,337lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 48.8s99% target: 268 km/h / 167 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.6s Calculated | 21.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 321hp/t239kW/t145hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 454Nm/t304lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 538km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,997cc305cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,050mm159in | 4,914mm193in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,180mm46in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,282mm90in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,460mm57in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 215L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 278g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- TVR Griffith 5.0: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 5,250 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TVRGriffith5.0 | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.6 s | 21.2 s |
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
TVR Griffith 5.0 has 30 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and TVR Griffith 5.0: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 481 Nm 355 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 4.5 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Griffith 5.0 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 321 hp/t 239 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.5 s | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.5 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TVRGriffith5.0 | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 481 Nm 355 lb-ft | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 538 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 278 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 321 hp/t 239 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
TVR Griffith 5.0
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 9 Nm more
- Is 545 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 128 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























