TVR Griffith
Car comparison
TVR Griffith 5.0vsBMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Convertible (E36)
3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Griffith 5.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed271 km/h168 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque481 Nm355 lb-ft
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight321 hp/t239 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score75/100
BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TVRGriffith5.0 | BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 321hp239kW |
| Torque | 481Nm355lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,060kg2,337lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 48.7s99% target: 268 km/h / 167 mph Calculated | 75.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.6s Calculated | 20.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 321hp/t239kW/t145hp/1000 lb Calculated | 206hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 454Nm/t304lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 559km347mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,997cc305cu in | 3,201cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,050mm159in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,710mm67in |
| Height | 1,180mm46in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,282mm90in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,460mm57in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,444mm57in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 230L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- TVR Griffith 5.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 5,250 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TVRGriffith5.0 | BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.6 s | 20.1 s |
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW |
TVR Griffith 5.0 has 19 hp more than BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 and TVR Griffith 5.0: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 481 Nm 355 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 4.5 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 5.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Griffith 5.0 and BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 321 hp/t 239 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 206 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.5 s | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRGriffith5.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TVRGriffith5.0 | BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 321 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 481 Nm 355 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 559 km 347 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 230 L 8.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 321 hp/t 239 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 206 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
TVR Griffith 5.0
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 131 Nm more
- Is 500 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 115 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























