Chevrolet Blazer
Car comparison
Chevrolet Blazer 650TvsHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020
2.2 CRDi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Blazer 650T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.0 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful237 hp177 kW
- Lightest1,835 kg4,045 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk1,017 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletBlazer650T | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 202hp151kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,871kg4,125lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,550kg5,622lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 91.8s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.6s Calculated | 70.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,196km743mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,151cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,999mm197in | 4,785mm188in |
| Width | 1,953mm77in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,732mm68in | 1,685mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,863mm113in | 2,765mm109in |
| Front track | 1,687mm66in | 1,651mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,683mm66in | 1,661mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 176mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 1,017L | 831L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,103L | 1,704L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Blazer 650T: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 3,800 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletBlazer650T | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.6 s | 70.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 202 hp 151 kW |
Chevrolet Blazer 650T has 35 hp more than Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi.
The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi and Chevrolet Blazer 650T: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 9.0 s |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 237 hp 177 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 202 hp 151 kW | 9.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletBlazer650T | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 202 hp 151 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,196 km 743 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,017 L 35.9 cu ft | 831 L 29.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Blazer 650T
- Has 35 hp more
- Is 36 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 186 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
- Has 90 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























