Caterham CSR
Car comparison
Caterham CSR CSRvsHonda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004 2.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004
2.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Caterham CSR CSR
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque271 Nm200 lb-ft
- Lightest515 kg1,135 lb
- Best power-to-weight505 hp/t376 kW/t2.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score33/100
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CaterhamCSRCSR | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 242hp180kW |
| Torque | 271Nm200lb-ft | 221Nm163lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 515kg1,135lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 33.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 79.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.9s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.8s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 505hp/t376kW/t229hp/1000 lb Calculated | 194hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 526Nm/t352lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,261cc138cu in | 2,157cc132cu in |
| Length | 3,300mm130in | 4,135mm163in |
| Width | 1,505mm59in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | - | 1,285mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,315mm91in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,470mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,465mm58in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Caterham CSR CSR: Power / Torque
- Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 7,500 rpm | - | 7,750 rpm |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 7,800 rpm | 6,500-7,500 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CaterhamCSRCSR | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.9 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.8 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 260 hp 194 kW |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 242 hp 180 kW |
Caterham CSR CSR has 18 hp more than Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2.
The biggest power difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2 and Caterham CSR CSR: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 221 Nm 163 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 515 kg 1,135 lb |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 3.0 s |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Caterham CSR CSR and Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2: 3.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 505 hp/t 376 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 260 hp 194 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 242 hp 180 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CaterhamCSRCSR | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 242 hp 180 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft | 221 Nm 163 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 515 kg 1,135 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 505 hp/t 376 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Caterham CSR CSR
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 735 kg lighter
- Is 3.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 311 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























