Caterham CSR
Car comparison
Caterham CSR CSRvsAlfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (939)
3.2 JTS V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Caterham CSR CSR
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest515 kg1,135 lb
- Best power-to-weight505 hp/t376 kW/t2.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score33/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6
- Highest torque322 Nm237 lb-ft
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CaterhamCSRCSR | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 271Nm200lb-ft | 322Nm237lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 515kg1,135lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 33.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 104.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.9s Calculated | 29.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 505hp/t376kW/t229hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 526Nm/t352lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 631km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,261cc138cu in | 3,195cc195cu in |
| Length | 3,300mm130in | 4,393mm173in |
| Width | 1,505mm59in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | - | 1,318mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,315mm91in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,465mm58in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 253L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 262g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Caterham CSR CSR: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 7,500 rpm | - | 7,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CaterhamCSRCSR | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.9 s | 29.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.8 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 260 hp 194 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 515 kg 1,135 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 3.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Caterham CSR CSR and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6: 4.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 505 hp/t 376 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 260 hp 194 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.2 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaterhamCSRCSR |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CaterhamCSRCSR | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 JTS V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 515 kg 1,135 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 631 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 262 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 253 L 8.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 505 hp/t 376 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Caterham CSR CSR
- Is 1,085 kg lighter
- Is 4.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 342 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 JTS V6
- Has 51 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























