Car comparison

Caterham CSR CSRvsFord Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Caterham CSR

CSR

260 hp2261 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2004-2014
VS

Ford Mustang V Convertible

4.6 i V8 24V

304 hp4601 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2005-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Caterham CSR CSR

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    515 kg
    1,135 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    505 hp/t
    376 kW/t
    2.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    71/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCaterhamCSRCSRFordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Power
260hp194kW
304hp227kW
Torque
271Nm200lb-ft
434Nm320lb-ft
Curb weight
515kg1,135lb
1,685kg3,715lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
33.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
68.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.0s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
9.9s
Calculated
22.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.9s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption city-
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.8s
Calculated
13.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
505hp/t376kW/t229hp/1000 lb
Calculated
180hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
526Nm/t352lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
2,261cc138cu in
4,601cc281cu in
Length
3,300mm130in
4,765mm188in
Width
1,505mm59in
1,877mm74in
Height-
1,415mm56in
Wheelbase
2,315mm91in
2,720mm107in
Front track
1,505mm59in
1,585mm62in
Rear track
1,465mm58in
1,600mm63in
Trunk volume-
275L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank-
61L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Caterham CSR CSRFord Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24VPowerTorque
  • Caterham CSR CSR: Power / Torque
  • Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CaterhamCSRCSR7,500 rpm-7,750 rpm
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V5,750 rpm4,500 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCaterhamCSRCSRFordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.9 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.0 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.9 s
22.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
4.7 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.0 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.1 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.8 s
13.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
129 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CaterhamCSRCSR
260 hp
194 kW
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
304 hp
227 kW

Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V has 44 hp more than Caterham CSR CSR.

The biggest power difference is between Caterham CSR CSR and Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V: 44 hp (33 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CaterhamCSRCSR
271 Nm
200 lb-ft
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
434 Nm
320 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CaterhamCSRCSR
515 kg
1,135 lb
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
1,685 kg
3,715 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CaterhamCSRCSR
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CaterhamCSRCSR3.0 s
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V5.3 s

Although Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V has more power, Caterham CSR CSR is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Caterham CSR CSR and Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V: 2.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CaterhamCSRCSR
505 hp/t
376 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CaterhamCSRCSR
260 hp
194 kW
3.0 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
304 hp
227 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CaterhamCSRCSR
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h3.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,300 mm
129.9 in
Height-
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Power
304 hp
227 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Length
4,765 mm
187.6 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCaterhamCSRCSRFordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Power
260 hp
194 kW
304 hp
227 kW
Torque
271 Nm
200 lb-ft
434 Nm
320 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.0 s
5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
515 kg
1,135 lb
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,300 mm
129.9 in
Height-
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Length
4,765 mm
187.6 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Trunk score
-
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
505 hp/t
376 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Caterham CSR CSR

  • Is 1,170 kg lighter
  • Is 2.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 324 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Caterham CSR CSR
Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Caterham CSR CSR vs Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster