Honda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Honda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004 2.2vsCaterham CSR CSR
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCaterham CSR
CSR
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful242 hp180 kW
- Highest torque221 Nm163 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range505 km314 mi
- Best economy score80/100
Caterham CSR CSR
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Lightest565 kg1,246 lb
- Best power-to-weight354 hp/t264 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | CaterhamCSRCSR |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 242hp180kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 221Nm163lb-ft | 221Nm163lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,250kg2,756lb | 565kg1,246lb |
| Gross weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 875kg1,929lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 36.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 194hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 354hp/t264kW/t161hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 391Nm/t262lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | 365km227mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,157cc132cu in | 2,261cc138cu in |
| Length | 4,135mm163in | 3,300mm130in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,685mm66in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,140mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,315mm91in |
| Front track | 1,470mm58in | 1,505mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,465mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 160L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 42L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2: Power / Torque
- Caterham CSR CSR: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 7,800 rpm | 6,500-7,500 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 7,000 rpm | - | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | CaterhamCSRCSR |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 14.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 242 hp 180 kW |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 200 hp 149 kW |
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2 has 42 hp more than Caterham CSR CSR.
The biggest power difference is between Caterham CSR CSR and Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2: 42 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 221 Nm 163 lb-ft |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 221 Nm 163 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 565 kg 1,246 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 6.2 s |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 3.7 s |
Although Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2 has more power, Caterham CSR CSR is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Caterham CSR CSR and Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2: 2.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2 and Caterham CSR CSR: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 505 km 314 mi |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 365 km 227 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 242 hp 180 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 200 hp 149 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CaterhamCSRCSR |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| CaterhamCSRCSR |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Caterham CSR CSR is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| CaterhamCSRCSR | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | CaterhamCSRCSR | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 242 hp 180 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 221 Nm 163 lb-ft | 221 Nm 163 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | 565 kg 1,246 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | 365 km 227 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2 | Caterham CSR CSR |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2
- Has 42 hp more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 140 km (87 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Caterham CSR CSR
- Is 685 kg lighter
- Is 2.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 160 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























