Car comparison

Honda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004 2.0vsCaterham CSR CSR

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Honda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004

2.0

240 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2004-2008
VS

Caterham CSR

CSR

200 hp2261 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2004-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Caterham CSR CSR

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Highest torque
    221 Nm
    163 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    565 kg
    1,246 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    354 hp/t
    264 kW/t
    2.8 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    52/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    32/100

Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.9 L/100 km
    23.8 mpg US
    28.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.2 L/100 km
    17.8 mpg US
    21.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    505 km
    314 mi
  • Best economy score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0CaterhamCSRCSR
Power
240hp179kW
200hp149kW
Torque
208Nm153lb-ft
221Nm163lb-ft
Curb weight
1,270kg2,800lb
565kg1,246lb
Gross weight
1,535kg3,384lb
875kg1,929lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
79.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
36.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
23.5s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
11.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
354hp/t264kW/t161hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
391Nm/t262lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
505km314mi
Calculated
365km227mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
2,261cc138cu in
Length
4,135mm163in
3,300mm130in
Width
1,750mm69in
1,685mm66in
Height
1,285mm51in
1,140mm45in
Wheelbase
2,400mm94in
2,315mm91in
Front track
1,470mm58in
1,505mm59in
Rear track
1,510mm59in
1,465mm58in
Ground clearance
108mm4in
-
Trunk volume
143L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
50L
42L
CO2 emissions
235g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0Caterham CSR CSRPowerTorque
  • Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Caterham CSR CSR: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.08,300 rpm7,500 rpm8,550 rpm
CaterhamCSRCSR7,000 rpm-7,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0CaterhamCSRCSR
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.5 s
14.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
7.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
9.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
11.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
189 km/h
117 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
240 hp
179 kW
CaterhamCSRCSR
200 hp
149 kW

Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 has 40 hp more than Caterham CSR CSR.

The biggest power difference is between Caterham CSR CSR and Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
208 Nm
153 lb-ft
CaterhamCSRCSR
221 Nm
163 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
1,270 kg
2,800 lb
CaterhamCSRCSR
565 kg
1,246 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
CaterhamCSRCSR
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.06.2 s
CaterhamCSRCSR3.7 s

Although Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 has more power, Caterham CSR CSR is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Caterham CSR CSR and Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0: 2.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
CaterhamCSRCSR
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 and Caterham CSR CSR: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
CaterhamCSRCSR
354 hp/t
264 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
505 km
314 mi
CaterhamCSRCSR
365 km
227 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
240 hp
179 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
CaterhamCSRCSR
200 hp
149 kW
3.7 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
143 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
4,135 mm
162.8 in
Height
1,285 mm
50.6 in
CaterhamCSRCSR
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,300 mm
129.9 in
Height
1,140 mm
44.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
CaterhamCSRCSR
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Caterham CSR CSR is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
6.2 s
CaterhamCSRCSR
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
3.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
CaterhamCSRCSR
354 hp/t
264 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0CaterhamCSRCSR
Power
240 hp
179 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
208 Nm
153 lb-ft
221 Nm
163 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
1,270 kg
2,800 lb
565 kg
1,246 lb
Fuel consumption
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
143 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
4,135 mm
162.8 in
Height
1,285 mm
50.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,300 mm
129.9 in
Height
1,140 mm
44.9 in
Range score
505 km
314 mi
365 km
227 mi
CO2 score
235 g/km
-
Trunk score
143 L
5.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
354 hp/t
264 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHonda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0Caterham CSR CSR
Consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.33 LC100 km20.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.88 LC100 mi32.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,599 LC/year3,019 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 140 km (87 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Caterham CSR CSR

  • Has 13 Nm more
  • Is 705 kg lighter
  • Is 2.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 165 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
Caterham CSR CSR
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0vsHondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
CSR
1.8 TBi
VS
CaterhamCSRCSRvsAlfa RomeoSpider (939)1.8 TBi
2.0
3.2 V6
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0vsAlfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
CSR
2.0 TFSI
VS
CaterhamCSRCSRvsAUDIA3 Cabriolet (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI
2.0
630i
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i
CSR
125i
VS
CaterhamCSRCSRvsBMW1 Series Convertible (E88)125i
2.0
2.3 i 20V T5
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0vsVolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5
CSR
JCW 1.6
VS
CaterhamCSRCSRvsMiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6
2.0
330Ci
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0vsBMW3 Series Convertible (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci
CSR
2.0 TFSI
VS
CaterhamCSRCSRvsAUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)2.0 TFSI
2.0
330d
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0vsBMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d
CSR
2.2
VS
CaterhamCSRCSRvsHondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2
Honda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004 2.0 vs Caterham CSR CSR - car comparison - FastVsFaster