Mercedes-Benz CL (C216)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12vsCadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XLR
V 4.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful517 hp386 kW
- Highest torque830 Nm612 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Lightest1,730 kg3,814 lb
- Best power-to-weight260 hp/t194 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption21.1 L/100 km11.1 mpg US13.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 517hp386kW | 449hp335kW |
| Torque | 830Nm612lb-ft | 561Nm414lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 2,620kg5,776lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 62.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.9s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.7L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 393Nm/t263lb-ft/ton Calculated | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 629km391mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,513cc336cu in | 4,371cc267cu in |
| Length | 5,065mm199in | 4,513mm178in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,836mm72in |
| Height | 1,419mm56in | 1,279mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,955mm116in | 2,685mm106in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,578mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 125L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 328L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 5,000 rpm | 1,900-3,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.9 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 113 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12 has 68 hp more than Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12: 68 hp (51 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 4.6 s |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12 and Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 517 hp 386 kW | 449 hp 335 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 629 km 391 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,754 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12
- Has 68 hp more
- Has 269 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 365 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Is 380 kg lighter
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























