Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8vsCadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XLR
V 4.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque625 Nm461 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight291 hp/t217 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption18.9 L/100 km12.4 mpg US14.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Lightest1,730 kg3,814 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 449hp335kW |
| Torque | 625Nm461lb-ft | 561Nm414lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,753kg3,865lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 62.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.9s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 4,371cc267cu in |
| Length | 4,794mm189in | 4,513mm178in |
| Width | - | 1,836mm72in |
| Height | 1,322mm52in | 1,279mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,752mm108in | 2,685mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,578mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 125L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 328L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.9 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW |
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 has 61 hp more than Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8: 61 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 | 4.8 s |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 and Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 449 hp 335 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8
- Has 61 hp more
- Has 64 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 205 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Is 23 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























