Cadillac XLR
4.6 i V8 32V
325 hp4565 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2009
Car comparison
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32VvsMG Xpower SV 4.6 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
MG Xpower SV
4.6 i V8 32V
320 hp4600 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2005
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
MG Xpower SV 4.6 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight208 hp/t155 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.0 L/100 km14.7 mpg US17.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score36/100
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful325 hp242 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 325hp242kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 68.8s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 19.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 553km344mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,565cc279cu in | 4,600cc281cu in |
| Length | 4,513mm178in | 4,480mm176in |
| Width | 1,836mm72in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,279mm50in | 1,320mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,685mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,678mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,626mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 125L | 250L |
| Max trunk volume | 328L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 291g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32VMG Xpower SV 4.6 i V8 32VPowerTorque
- Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- MG Xpower SV 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 19.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW |
| MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V | 320 hp 239 kW |
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V has 5 hp more than MG Xpower SV 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between MG Xpower SV 4.6 i V8 32V and Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 5.9 s |
| MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V | 5.4 s |
Although Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V has more power, MG Xpower SV 4.6 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG Xpower SV 4.6 i V8 32V and Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.4 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 325 hp 242 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 553 km 344 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 291 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
MG Xpower SV 4.6 i V8 32V
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
MG Xpower SV 4.6 i V8 32V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32VvsNissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V
MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32VvsBMW6 Series (E63)645Ci
CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32VvsBMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i
MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32VvsBMWZ3 Coupe (E36/8)3.2
CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32VvsNissan350Z (Z33)Facelift 20073.5i V6 24V
MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32VvsBMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2
CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32VvsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8
MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32VvsBMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V
CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32VvsBMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2
CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32VvsPorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32VvsBMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i
MGXpower SV4.6 i V8 32VvsMercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8