Opel Vectra C · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
Opel Vectra C · Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V TurbovsCadillac STS 3.6 i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac STS
3.6 i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t125 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range592 km368 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 346Nm255lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,782kg3,929lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | - |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.9s Calculated | 28.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 167hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 592km368mi Calculated | 541km336mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 3,564cc217cu in |
| Length | 4,611mm182in | 4,985mm196in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,464mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,957mm116in |
| Front track | 1,536mm60in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,581mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 464L |
| Max trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 285g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 5,500 rpm | - | 5,750 rpm |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 6,200 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.9 s | 28.5 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 258 hp 192 kW |
Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 has 8 hp more than Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo and Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 1,782 kg 3,929 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 6.9 s |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 7.4 s |
Although Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 has more power, Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo and Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo and Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 167 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 592 km 368 mi |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 541 km 336 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 258 hp 192 kW | 7.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 167 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | CadillacSTS3.6 i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,782 kg 3,929 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 592 km 368 mi | 541 km 336 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 285 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 167 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo | Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Has 4 Nm more
- Is 287 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 51 km (32 mi) more estimated range
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Cadillac STS 3.6 i V6
- Has 8 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























