Car comparison

Hongqi HS7 II 2.0TvsCadillac GT4 28T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Hongqi HS7 II

2.0T

252 hp1989 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Cadillac GT4

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac GT4 28T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Lightest
    1,760 kg
    3,880 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    252 hp
    188 kW
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHongqiHS7 II2.0TCadillacGT428T
Power
252hp188kW
237hp177kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,080kg4,586lb
1,760kg3,880lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
111.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
79.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
41.3s
Calculated
37.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.8mpg US34.5mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
813km505mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,989cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,995mm197in
4,633mm182in
Width
1,960mm77in
1,878mm74in
Height
1,760mm69in
1,535mm60in
Wheelbase
2,920mm115in
2,800mm110in
Front track-
1,604mm63in
Rear track-
1,607mm63in
Ground clearance-
131mm5in
Trunk volume-
289L
Max trunk volume-
1,190L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank-
61L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHongqiHS7 II2.0TCadillacGT428T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
41.3 s
37.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
252 hp
188 kW
CadillacGT428T
237 hp
177 kW

Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T has 15 hp more than Cadillac GT4 28T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
CadillacGT428T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
2,080 kg
4,586 lb
CadillacGT428T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
230 km/h
143 mph
CadillacGT428T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T8.8 s
CadillacGT428T7.8 s

Although Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T has more power, Cadillac GT4 28T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
8.2 L/100 km
28.8 mpg US
34.5 mpg UK
CadillacGT428T
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
CadillacGT428T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
252 hp
188 kW
8.8 s
230 km/h
143 mph
CadillacGT428T
237 hp
177 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,760 mm
69.3 in
CadillacGT428T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.8 mpg US
34.5 mpg UK
CadillacGT428T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Cadillac GT4 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
8.2 L/100 km
28.8 mpg US
34.5 mpg UK
8.8 s
CadillacGT428T
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.8 mpg US
34.5 mpg UK
CadillacGT428T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHongqiHS7 II2.0TCadillacGT428T
Power
252 hp
188 kW
237 hp
177 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
7.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,080 kg
4,586 lb
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.8 mpg US
34.5 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,760 mm
69.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Range score
-
813 km
505 mi
Trunk score
-
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHongqi HS7 II 2.0TCadillac GT4 28T
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.8 mpg US34.5 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.32 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.04 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,227 L324 US gal270 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,147 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Cadillac GT4 28T

  • Is 320 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T
Cadillac GT4 28T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
28T
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
CadillacGT428TvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh
2.0T
2.0i
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
28T
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
CadillacGT428TvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
28T
45 TFSI
VS
CadillacGT428TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
28T
45 TDI V6
VS
CadillacGT428TvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
28T
Turismo 54 kWh
VS
CadillacGT428TvsAbarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsAUDIQ645 TFSI
2.0T
650T
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T vs Cadillac GT4 28T - car comparison - FastVsFaster