Hongqi HS7 II
Car comparison
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0TvsAUDI Q6 45 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q6
45 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lightest2,080 kg4,586 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.8 mpg US34.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score90/100
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HongqiHS7 II2.0T | AUDIQ645 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,280kg5,027lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,780kg6,129lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 111.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 90.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.3s Calculated | 46.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.8mpg US34.5mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.4mpg US30.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 756km470mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,989cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,995mm197in | 5,099mm201in |
| Width | 1,960mm77in | 2,014mm79in |
| Height | 1,760mm69in | 1,784mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,920mm115in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,704mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,721mm68in |
| Trunk volume | - | 286L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,398L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | - | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HongqiHS7 II2.0T | AUDIQ645 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.3 s | 46.0 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 252 hp 188 kW |
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI has 13 hp more than Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T.
The biggest power difference is between Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T and AUDI Q6 45 TFSI: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb |
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 2,280 kg 5,027 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 8.8 s |
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q6 45 TFSI and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 8.2 L/100 km 28.8 mpg US 34.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T and AUDI Q6 45 TFSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 252 hp 188 kW | 8.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ645 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.8 mpg US 34.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ645 TFSI |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 8.2 L/100 km 28.8 mpg US 34.5 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.8 mpg US 34.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HongqiHS7 II2.0T | AUDIQ645 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb | 2,280 kg 5,027 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.8 mpg US 34.5 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 756 km 470 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T | AUDI Q6 45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.8 mpg US34.5 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.4 mpg US30.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.32 LC100 km | 16.21 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.04 LC100 mi | 26.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,227 L324 US gal270 UK gal | 1,389 L367 US gal306 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,147 LC/year | 2,431 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























