Hongqi HS7 II
Car comparison
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0TvsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
EQE 300 98 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Lightest2,080 kg4,586 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HongqiHS7 II2.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,385kg5,258lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,975kg6,559lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 111.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.4s Calculated | 38.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.8mpg US34.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,989cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,995mm197in | 4,863mm191in |
| Width | 1,960mm77in | 1,940mm76in |
| Height | 1,760mm69in | 1,685mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,920mm115in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | - | 1,654mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,659mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 181mm7in |
| Trunk volume | - | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HongqiHS7 II2.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.4 s | 38.5 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 252 hp 188 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW |
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 8.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 7.6 s |
Although Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 252 hp 188 kW | 8.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HongqiHS7 II2.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.8 mpg US 34.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.8 mpg US34.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.32 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,227 L324 US gal270 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,147 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























