Car comparison

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CTS III

V 6.2 V8

649 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2016-2019
VS

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020

AMG E 63 S

612 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.4 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.6 L/100 km
    20.3 mpg US
    24.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.7 L/100 km
    15.0 mpg US
    18.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    569 km
    354 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    88/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    322 km/h
    200 mph
  • Most powerful
    649 hp
    484 kW
  • Highest torque
    855 Nm
    631 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,880 kg
    4,145 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    345 hp/t
    257 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
Power
649hp484kW
612hp456kW
Torque
855Nm631lb-ft
850Nm627lb-ft
Curb weight
1,880kg4,145lb
1,935kg4,266lb
Gross weight-
2,555kg5,633lb
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
40.7s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph
Calculated
35.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
3.4s
0-200 km/h
9.2s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
3.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.1s
Calculated
10.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
345hp/t257kW/t157hp/1000 lb
Calculated
316hp/t236kW/t143hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
455Nm/t304lb-ft/ton
Calculated
439Nm/t294lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
522km324mi
Calculated
569km354mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,162cc376cu in
3,982cc243cu in
Length
5,021mm198in
4,940mm194in
Width
1,833mm72in
1,852mm73in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,910mm115in
2,939mm116in
Front track
1,577mm62in
1,601mm63in
Rear track
1,554mm61in
1,595mm63in
Trunk volume
447L
540L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 SPowerTorque
  • Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V86,400 rpm3,600 rpm6,650 rpm
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S5,750-6,500 rpm2,500-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
3.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
3.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.2 s
8.5 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
7.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.5 s
9.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.1 s
10.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
223 km/h
139 mph
229 km/h
142 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
649 hp
484 kW
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
612 hp
456 kW

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 has 37 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S and Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8: 37 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
855 Nm
631 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
850 Nm
627 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
1,880 kg
4,145 lb
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
1,935 kg
4,266 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
322 km/h
200 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V83.7 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S3.4 s

Although Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S and Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S and Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
522 km
324 mi
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
569 km
354 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
649 hp
484 kW
3.7 s
322 km/h
200 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
612 hp
456 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
Power
649 hp
484 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,021 mm
197.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,940 mm
194.5 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
Power
649 hp
484 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
3.7 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
3.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
Power
649 hp
484 kW
612 hp
456 kW
Torque
855 Nm
631 lb-ft
850 Nm
627 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
3.4 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Lightness
1,880 kg
4,145 lb
1,935 kg
4,266 lb
Fuel consumption
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,021 mm
197.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,940 mm
194.5 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
522 km
324 mi
569 km
354 mi
Trunk score
447 L
15.8 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S
Consumption13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.15 LC100 km20.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi38.87 LC100 mi32.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,623 LC/year3,045 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8

  • Has 37 hp more
  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 55 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S

  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 93 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 63 S
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 S
AMG E 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 SvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8
V 6.2 V8
V 6.0 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8
AMG E 63 S
AMG E 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 SvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8
V 6.2 V8
SV Project 8 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8
AMG E 63 S
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 SvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
V 6.2 V8
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
AMG E 63 S
E 450
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 SvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 450
V 6.2 V8
S 6.0 W12
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
AMG E 63 S
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 SvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006AMG E 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsAUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus
AMG E 63 S
AMG E 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 SvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8
Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020 AMG E 63 S - car comparison - FastVsFaster