Car comparison

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CTS III

V 6.2 V8

649 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2016-2019
VS

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

R 5.0 V8

575 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    322 km/h
    200 mph
  • Most powerful
    649 hp
    484 kW
  • Highest torque
    855 Nm
    631 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    345 hp/t
    257 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    86/100
  • Best performance score
    91/100

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8

  • Lightest
    1,875 kg
    4,134 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    721 km
    448 mi
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
Power
649hp484kW
575hp429kW
Torque
855Nm631lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,880kg4,145lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
40.7s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph
Calculated
49.5s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
9.2s
Calculated
11.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.1s
Calculated
12.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
345hp/t257kW/t157hp/1000 lb
Calculated
307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
455Nm/t304lb-ft/ton
Calculated
373Nm/t250lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
522km324mi
Calculated
721km448mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,162cc376cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
5,021mm198in
5,130mm202in
Width
1,833mm72in
1,899mm75in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,910mm115in
3,032mm119in
Front track
1,577mm62in
1,626mm64in
Rear track
1,554mm61in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
447L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
80L
CO2 emissions-
264g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V86,400 rpm3,600 rpm6,650 rpm
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V86,250-6,500 rpm3,500-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.2 s
11.3 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.5 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.1 s
12.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
223 km/h
139 mph
207 km/h
129 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
649 hp
484 kW
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 has 74 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8 and Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8: 74 hp (55 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
855 Nm
631 lb-ft
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
1,880 kg
4,145 lb
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
1,875 kg
4,134 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
322 km/h
200 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V83.7 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V84.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8 and Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8: 2.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
522 km
324 mi
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
721 km
448 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
649 hp
484 kW
3.7 s
322 km/h
200 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
Power
649 hp
484 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,021 mm
197.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
Power
649 hp
484 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
3.7 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
Power
649 hp
484 kW
575 hp
429 kW
Torque
855 Nm
631 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
4.4 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Lightness
1,880 kg
4,145 lb
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
Fuel consumption
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,021 mm
197.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
522 km
324 mi
721 km
448 mi
CO2 score
-
264 g/km
Trunk score
447 L
15.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8
Consumption13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.15 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi38.87 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,623 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8

  • Has 74 hp more
  • Has 155 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8

  • Is 5 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 199 km (124 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8
Jaguar XJ (X351) R 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
R 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
V 6.2 V8
V 6.0 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8
R 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
SV Project 8 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
4.2 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
V 6.2 V8
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
R 5.0 V8
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
S 6.0 W12
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
R 5.0 V8
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
V 6.2 V8
4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsAUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus
R 5.0 V8
R 4.0 24V Sport
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport
Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 vs Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster