Car comparison

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8vsJaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CTS II

V 6.2 V8

564 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDManualSuperchargedSedan2008-2014
VS

Jaguar XF (X250)

R 5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8

  • Lightest
    1,891 kg
    4,169 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.5 L/100 km
    18.8 mpg US
    22.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.7 L/100 km
    12.6 mpg US
    15.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    560 km
    348 mi
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best economy score
    73/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    564 hp
    421 kW
  • Highest torque
    747 Nm
    551 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    295 hp/t
    220 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    81/100
  • Best performance score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
Power
564hp421kW
510hp380kW
Torque
747Nm551lb-ft
625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight
1,915kg4,222lb
1,891kg4,169lb
Gross weight-
2,330kg5,137lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
37.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
45.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
11.5s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.7s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK
18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.7s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb
Calculated
270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
390Nm/t261lb-ft/ton
Calculated
331Nm/t221lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
405km252mi
Calculated
560km348mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,162cc376cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,859mm191in
4,961mm195in
Width
1,842mm73in
1,877mm74in
Height
1,473mm58in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,880mm113in
2,909mm115in
Front track
1,575mm62in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,577mm62in
1,571mm62in
Trunk volume
385L
500L
Max trunk volume-
923L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V86,100 rpm3,800 rpm6,350 rpm
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.7 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.9 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.5 s
14.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.9 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.7 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
202 km/h
125 mph
190 km/h
118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 has 54 hp more than Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 54 hp (40 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
1,915 kg
4,222 lb
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
1,891 kg
4,169 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V83.9 s
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V84.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 4.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
270 hp/t
201 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
405 km
252 mi
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
560 km
348 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,961 mm
195.3 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
3.9 s
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
270 hp/t
201 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.9 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,915 kg
4,222 lb
1,891 kg
4,169 lb
Fuel consumption
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,961 mm
195.3 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
405 km
252 mi
560 km
348 mi
Trunk score
385 L
13.6 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
270 hp/t
201 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8
Consumption16.8 L/100 km14 mpg US16.8 mpg UK12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km29.40 LC100 km21.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi47.31 LC100 mi35.20 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,520 L666 US gal554 UK gal1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,410 LC/year3,281 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Has 54 hp more
  • Has 122 Nm more
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8

  • Is 24 kg lighter
  • Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 155 km (96 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 115 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
R 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
V 6.2 V8
V 5.7 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8
R 5.0 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
V 6.2 V8
AMG S 63 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
R 5.0 V8
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
V 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
R 5.0 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)S 3.0 V6
V 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
R 5.0 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged
V 6.2 V8
760i
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsBMW7 Series (F01)760i
R 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 vs Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster