Cadillac CTS II
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 · Stage 3vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 · Stage 1vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 · Stage 2vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS II
V 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)
Cadillac CTS II
V 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)
Cadillac CTS II
V 6.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.1 s
- Fastest top speed288 km/h179 mph
- Most powerful801 hp597 kW
- Highest torque1,083 Nm799 lb-ft
- Lightest1,915 kg4,222 lb
- Best power-to-weight418 hp/t312 kW/t2.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption16.8 L/100 km14.0 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption19.6 L/100 km12.0 mpg US14.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range405 km252 mi
- Largest trunk385 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score62/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 801hp597kW+237 hp | 643hp479kW+79 hp | 705hp526kW+141 hp | 564hp421kW |
| Torque | 1,083Nm799lb-ft+336 Nm | 867Nm639lb-ft+120 Nm | 956Nm705lb-ft+209 Nm | 747Nm551lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,915kg4,222lb | 1,915kg4,222lb | 1,915kg4,222lb | 1,915kg4,222lb |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | 277 km/h 172 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 30.6s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph-6.6 s Calculated | 35.5s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph-1.7 s Calculated | 31.6s99% target: 274 km/h / 170 mph-5.5 s Calculated | 37.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.1s-0.8 s | 3.6s-0.3 s | 3.4s-0.5 s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.4s-3.1 s Calculated | 9.7s-1.7 s Calculated | 9.3s-2.2 s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.0s-0.7 s Calculated | 3.5s-0.3 s Calculated | 3.3s-0.5 s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.6s-1.1 s Calculated | 11.2s-0.5 s Calculated | 11.0s-0.7 s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 418hp/t312kW/t190hp/1000 lb Calculated | 336hp/t250kW/t152hp/1000 lb Calculated | 368hp/t275kW/t167hp/1000 lb Calculated | 295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 566Nm/t378lb-ft/ton Calculated | 452Nm/t303lb-ft/ton Calculated | 499Nm/t334lb-ft/ton Calculated | 390Nm/t261lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 405km252mi Calculated | 405km252mi Calculated | 405km252mi Calculated | 405km252mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 6,162cc376cu in | 6,162cc376cu in | 6,162cc376cu in |
| Length | 4,859mm191in | 4,859mm191in | 4,859mm191in | 4,859mm191in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,842mm73in | 1,842mm73in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,473mm58in | 1,473mm58in | 1,473mm58in | 1,473mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,880mm113in | 2,880mm113in | 2,880mm113in | 2,880mm113in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,575mm62in | 1,575mm62in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,577mm62in | 1,577mm62in | 1,577mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 385L | 385L | 385L | 385L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L | 68L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 1) 643 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 2) 705 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 564 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.0 s | 3.5 s | 3.3 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.1 s | 3.6 s | 3.4 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.4 s | 9.7 s | 9.3 s | 11.5 s |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | 277 km/h 172 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 5.1 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.5 s | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 9.5 s | 9.3 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.6 s | 11.2 s | 11.0 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 225 km/h 140 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | 216 km/h 135 mph | 202 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 801 hp 597 kW |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 643 hp 479 kW |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 705 hp 526 kW |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 564 hp 421 kW |
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp has 237 hp more than Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 564 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 564 hp and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp: 237 hp (177 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 1,083 Nm 799 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 867 Nm 639 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 956 Nm 705 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 1,915 kg 4,222 lb |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 1,915 kg 4,222 lb |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 1,915 kg 4,222 lb |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 1,915 kg 4,222 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 3.1 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 3.6 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 3.4 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 564 hp: 0.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 2) 705 hp and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 1) 643 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 418 hp/t 312 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 336 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 368 hp/t 275 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 405 km 252 mi |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 405 km 252 mi |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 405 km 252 mi |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 405 km 252 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 801 hp 597 kW | 3.1 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 643 hp 479 kW | 3.6 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 705 hp 526 kW | 3.4 s | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 564 hp 421 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp |
| 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp |
| 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp |
| 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp |
| 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | 3.1 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 418 hp/t 312 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 336 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 368 hp/t 275 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 801 hp 597 kW | 643 hp 479 kW | 705 hp 526 kW | 564 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,083 Nm 799 lb-ft | 867 Nm 639 lb-ft | 956 Nm 705 lb-ft | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.1 s | 3.6 s | 3.4 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | 277 km/h 172 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,915 kg 4,222 lb | 1,915 kg 4,222 lb | 1,915 kg 4,222 lb | 1,915 kg 4,222 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 405 km 252 mi | 405 km 252 mi | 405 km 252 mi | 405 km 252 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 418 hp/t 312 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 336 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 368 hp/t 275 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 1) 643 hp | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 2) 705 hp | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 564 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.8 L/100 km14 mpg US16.8 mpg UK | 16.8 L/100 km14 mpg US16.8 mpg UK | 16.8 L/100 km14 mpg US16.8 mpg UK | 16.8 L/100 km14 mpg US16.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.40 LC100 km | 29.40 LC100 km | 29.40 LC100 km | 29.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.31 LC100 mi | 47.31 LC100 mi | 47.31 LC100 mi | 47.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,520 L666 US gal554 UK gal | 2,520 L666 US gal554 UK gal | 2,520 L666 US gal554 UK gal | 2,520 L666 US gal554 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,410 LC/year | 4,410 LC/year | 4,410 LC/year | 4,410 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp
- Has 158 hp more
- Has 217 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 82 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 1) 643 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























