Cadillac BLS Wagon
Car comparison
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TvsHonda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011
2.4 i-VTEC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t99 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk419 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
- Most powerful201 hp150 kW
- Best estimated range747 km464 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 201hp150kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 234Nm173lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,636kg3,607lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | - |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.6s Calculated | 36.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 143Nm/t96lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 699km434mi Calculated | 747km464mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,354cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,716mm186in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 1,802mm71in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,543mm61in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,705mm106in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | - |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 419L | 406L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,273L | 1,183L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 201g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
- Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 7,000 rpm | 4,300-4,400 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.6 s | 36.5 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 200 hp 149 kW |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 201 hp 150 kW |
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC has 1 hp more than Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 234 Nm 173 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 8.2 s |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.3 s |
Although Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC has more power, Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 699 km 434 mi |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 747 km 464 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.2 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 201 hp 150 kW | 8.3 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 201 hp 150 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 234 Nm 173 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 699 km 434 mi | 747 km 464 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 201 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 419 L 14.8 cu ft | 406 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T | Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
- Has 66 Nm more
- Is 126 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 13 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























