Car comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TvsHonda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.0 T

200 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009
VS

Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011

2.4 i-VTEC

201 hp2354 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    132 hp/t
    99 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    419 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 THondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Power
200hp149kW
201hp150kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
234Nm173lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,636kg3,607lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
-
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
77.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
77.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
34.6s
Calculated
36.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
143Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
699km434mi
Calculated
747km464mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,354cc144cu in
Length
4,716mm186in
4,750mm187in
Width
1,802mm71in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,543mm61in
1,470mm58in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,705mm106in
Front track
1,524mm60in
-
Rear track
1,506mm59in
-
Ground clearance
127mm5in
-
Trunk volume
419L
406L
Max trunk volume
1,273L
1,183L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
65L
CO2 emissions-
201g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 THonda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTECPowerTorque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
  • Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T5,500 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC7,000 rpm4,300-4,400 rpm7,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 THondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.6 s
36.5 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
92 mph
147 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
200 hp
149 kW
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
201 hp
150 kW

Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC has 1 hp more than Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
234 Nm
173 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
1,636 kg
3,607 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
225 km/h
140 mph
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC has more power, Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
699 km
434 mi
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
747 km
464 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
200 hp
149 kW
8.2 s
225 km/h
140 mph
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
201 hp
150 kW
8.3 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
406 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.2 s
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 THondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Power
200 hp
149 kW
201 hp
150 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
234 Nm
173 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
8.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,636 kg
3,607 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
406 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
Range score
699 km
434 mi
747 km
464 mi
CO2 score
-
201 g/km
Trunk score
419 L
14.8 cu ft
406 L
14.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 THonda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,284 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Has 66 Nm more
  • Is 126 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 13 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Honda Accord VIII 2.4 i-VTEC
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T vs Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC - car comparison - FastVsFaster