Volvo S60
Car comparison
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20VvsCadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS
2.8 T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 255hp190kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,025kg4,464lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 537km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,401cc147cu in | 2,792cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,576mm180in | 4,680mm184in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,752mm69in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 424L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,034L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 259g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 5,500 rpm | 2,100 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V has 5 hp more than Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 6.5 s |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 255 hp 190 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 537 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 259 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Has 15 Nm more
- Has 1 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























