Cadillac BLS
Car comparison
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6vsSubaru Legacy V 2.5 GT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru Legacy V
2.5 GT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t125 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk486 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,577kg3,477lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 57.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.4s Calculated | 20.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 2,457cc150cu in |
| Length | 4,680mm184in | 4,735mm186in |
| Width | 1,752mm69in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,505mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,750mm108in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,555mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 486L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 245g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
- Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 5,600 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.4 s | 20.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 265 hp 198 kW |
Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT has 10 hp more than Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 1,577 kg 3,477 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 6.9 s |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,577 kg 3,477 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 245 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 486 L 17.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 17 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 61 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























