Alfa Romeo 159
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6vsSubaru Legacy V 2.5 GT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru Legacy V
2.5 GT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk486 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 322Nm237lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,577kg3,477lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 57.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.0s Calculated | 20.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,195cc195cu in | 2,457cc150cu in |
| Length | 4,660mm183in | 4,735mm186in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,505mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,750mm108in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 486L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 260g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
- Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 5,600 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.0 s | 20.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 265 hp 198 kW |
Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT has 5 hp more than Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 and Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 1,577 kg 3,477 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 7.1 s |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT and Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,577 kg 3,477 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 260 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 486 L 17.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6
- Is 37 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 28 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 81 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























