Subaru Legacy V
Car comparison
Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GTvsAlfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 159
3.2 JTS V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,577 kg3,477 lb
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t125 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk486 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 322Nm237lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,577kg3,477lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 67.1s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.6s Calculated | 24.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 570km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,457cc150cu in | 3,195cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,735mm186in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,505mm59in | 1,422mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,750mm108in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 486L | 405L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 286g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 5,600 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.6 s | 24.2 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT has 5 hp more than Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 and Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 1,577 kg 3,477 lb |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 6.2 s |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT and Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.2 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruLegacy V2.5 GT | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,577 kg 3,477 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 570 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 286 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 486 L 17.2 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru Legacy V 2.5 GT
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 28 Nm more
- Is 53 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 81 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























