Cadillac BLS
Car comparison
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6vsVolvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60
2.4i T5 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,520kg3,351lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,025kg4,464lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 67.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.4s Calculated | 21.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 2,401cc147cu in |
| Length | 4,680mm184in | 4,576mm180in |
| Width | 1,752mm69in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,428mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,560mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 424L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,034L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 245g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 5,500 rpm | 2,100 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.4 s | 21.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW |
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V has 5 hp more than Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 6.9 s |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 6.9 s |
Although Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V has more power, Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 245 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Has 15 Nm more
- Has 1 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























