Car comparison

Cadillac CTS III 2.0vsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CTS III

2.0

272 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2014-2019
VS

Cadillac ATS Sedan

2.0

276 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2013-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Most powerful
    276 hp
    206 kW
  • Lightest
    1,542 kg
    3,400 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    179 hp/t
    133 kW/t
    5.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    744 km
    462 mi
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Cadillac CTS III 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    388 L
  • Best practicality score
    71/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCTS III2.0CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
272hp203kW
276hp206kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,725kg3,803lb
1,542kg3,400lb
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
57.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
23.2s
Calculated
20.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
735km457mi
Calculated
744km462mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,966mm196in
4,644mm183in
Width
1,833mm72in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,427mm56in
Wheelbase
2,910mm115in
2,775mm109in
Front track
1,560mm61in
1,512mm60in
Rear track
1,568mm62in
1,548mm61in
Trunk volume
388L
381L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
63L
CO2 emissions-
195g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CTS III 2.0Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0PowerTorque
  • Cadillac CTS III 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCTS III2.05,600 rpm3,000-4,500 rpm6,400 rpm
CadillacATS Sedan2.05,500 rpm1,700-5,500 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCTS III2.0CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.2 s
20.4 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
170 km/h
106 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
272 hp
203 kW
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
276 hp
206 kW

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 has 4 hp more than Cadillac CTS III 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS III 2.0 and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
1,542 kg
3,400 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
250 km/h
155 mph
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.06.8 s
CadillacATS Sedan2.06.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
735 km
457 mi
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
744 km
462 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCTS III2.0
272 hp
203 kW
6.8 s
250 km/h
155 mph
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
276 hp
206 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
388 L
13.7 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,644 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCTS III2.0
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
6.8 s
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCTS III2.0
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCTS III2.0CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
272 hp
203 kW
276 hp
206 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
6.1 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
1,542 kg
3,400 lb
Fuel consumption
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
388 L
13.7 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,644 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
Range score
735 km
457 mi
744 km
462 mi
CO2 score
-
195 g/km
Trunk score
388 L
13.7 cu ft
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CTS III 2.0Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Consumption9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.15 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.60 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,573 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CTS III 2.0

  • Has 47 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 7 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 183 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 9 km (6 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
2.0
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
2.0
V 5.7 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8
2.0
2.0
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacCTS III2.0
2.0
2.0
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacXTS28T
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0
730d
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsBMW7 Series (G11)730d
2.0
Veloce 2.0
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
2.0
3.0d V6
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
Cadillac CTS III 2.0 vs Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster