Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0vsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

Veloce 2.0

280 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2016-2018
VS

Cadillac ATS Sedan

2.0

276 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2013-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    255 km/h
    158 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,530 kg
    3,373 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    183 hp/t
    136 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    148 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    906 km
    563 mi
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
280hp209kW
276hp206kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,530kg3,373lb
1,542kg3,400lb
Gross weight
2,105kg4,641lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
49.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
57.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.2s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
16.3s
Calculated
20.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.0s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton
Calculated
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
906km563mi
Calculated
744km462mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,643mm183in
4,644mm183in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,436mm57in
1,427mm56in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,775mm109in
Front track
1,557mm61in
1,512mm60in
Rear track
1,625mm64in
1,548mm61in
Trunk volume
480L
381L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
63L
CO2 emissions
148g/km
195g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.05,250 rpm2,250 rpm5,500 rpm
CadillacATS Sedan2.05,500 rpm1,700-5,500 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.0 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.2 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.3 s
20.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
182 km/h
113 mph
170 km/h
106 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
280 hp
209 kW
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
276 hp
206 kW

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 has 4 hp more than Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
1,542 kg
3,400 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.05.2 s
CadillacATS Sedan2.06.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
183 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
906 km
563 mi
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
744 km
462 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
280 hp
209 kW
5.2 s
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
276 hp
206 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,644 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
5.2 s
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
183 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
276 hp
206 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.2 s
6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
1,542 kg
3,400 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,644 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
Range score
906 km
563 mi
744 km
462 mi
CO2 score
148 g/km
195 g/km
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
183 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 47 Nm more
  • Is 12 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 162 km (101 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 99 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 47 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Veloce 2.0
2.0 Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo
2.0
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Veloce 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0
2.0
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacCTS III2.0
Veloce 2.0
2.0
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacXTS28T
Veloce 2.0
Long Range 75 kWh
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsTeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Veloce 2.0
2.0
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
Veloce 2.0
450h V6
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 vs Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster