Volkswagen Passat (B8)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSIvsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac ATS Sedan
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range930 km578 mi
- Largest trunk586 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
- Highest torque353 Nm260 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 276hp206kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 353Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,542kg3,400lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 57.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.9s Calculated | 20.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 930km578mi Calculated | 744km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,767mm188in | 4,644mm183in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,427mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,548mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 586L | 381L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,152L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 195g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 5,600-6,500 rpm | 1,700-5,600 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.9 s | 20.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 276 hp 206 kW |
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI has 4 hp more than Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 5.5 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 930 km 578 mi |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 744 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 276 hp 206 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 276 hp 206 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 930 km 578 mi | 744 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 195 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 586 L 20.7 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 2 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 186 km (115 mi) more estimated range
- Has 205 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
- Has 3 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























