Maserati GranTurismo I
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo I MC Stradale 4.7 V8vsCadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac ATS Coupe
V 3.6 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Most powerful471 hp351 kW
- Highest torque603 Nm445 lb-ft
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Best power-to-weight273 hp/t204 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk295 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Maserati GranTurismo I MC Stradale 4.7 V8
- Fastest top speed303 km/h188 mph
- Best estimated range581 km361 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460hp343kW | 471hp351kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 603Nm445lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Top speed | 303 km/h 188 mph | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.6s99% target: 300 km/h / 186 mph Calculated | 64.3s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.8L/100 km9.9mpg US11.9mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 581km361mi Calculated | 488km303mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 3,564cc217cu in |
| Length | 4,933mm194in | 4,691mm185in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,343mm53in | 1,384mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,942mm116in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,568mm62in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 295L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | 360g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranTurismo I MC Stradale 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 5,850 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 13.0 s |
| Top speed | 303 km/h 188 mph | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 194 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW |
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 has 11 hp more than Maserati GranTurismo I MC Stradale 4.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati GranTurismo I MC Stradale 4.7 V8 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 303 km/h 188 mph |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 298 km/h 185 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 4.5 s |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 and Maserati GranTurismo I MC Stradale 4.7 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 and Maserati GranTurismo I MC Stradale 4.7 V8: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 581 km 361 mi |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 488 km 303 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.5 s | 303 km/h 188 mph |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW | 4.2 s | 298 km/h 185 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 |
| 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8 | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp 343 kW | 471 hp 351 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 303 km/h 188 mph | 298 km/h 185 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 581 km 361 mi | 488 km 303 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 360 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 295 L 10.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranTurismo I MC Stradale 4.7 V8 | Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.5 L/100 km15.2 mpg US18.2 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.13 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.65 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,325 L614 US gal511 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,069 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo I MC Stradale 4.7 V8
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 93 km (58 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 83 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























