Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsBuick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019 28T 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0i

250 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2020-2024
VS

Buick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019

28T 2.0

240 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    151 hp/t
    112 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0iBuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
250hp186kW
240hp179kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
69.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
66.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
21.4s
Calculated
26.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
831km517mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,962mm195in
5,026mm198in
Width-
1,866mm73in
Height
1,456mm57in
1,462mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,905mm114in
Front track
1,602mm63in
1,599mm63in
Rear track
1,605mm63in
1,602mm63in
Trunk volume
459L
-
Max trunk volume
1,484L
523L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
74L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0iBuick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
  • Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i5,500 rpm1,300-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.05,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0iBuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.4 s
26.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
250 hp
186 kW
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i has 10 hp more than Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
250 hp
186 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.5 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
459 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,962 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,456 mm
57.3 in
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
5,026 mm
197.9 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
6.9 s
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0iBuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
459 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,962 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,456 mm
57.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
5,026 mm
197.9 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Range score
831 km
517 mi
-
Trunk score
459 L
16.2 cu ft
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0iBuick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
Consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.58 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.07 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,336 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0i
Buick LaCrosse III China 28T 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0i vs Buick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster