Bugatti Chiron
Car comparison
Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16vsCzinger 21C 2.9 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCzinger 21C
2.9 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Czinger 21C 2.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h1.9 s
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight760 hp/t567 kW/t1.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score97/100
Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16
- Fastest top speed420 km/h261 mph
- Most powerful1,500 hp1,119 kW
- Highest torque1,600 Nm1,180 lb-ft
- Best economy score47/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | Czinger21C2.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,500hp1,119kW | 950hp708kW |
| Torque | 1,600Nm1,180lb-ft | 746Nm550lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 407 km/h 253 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 50.5s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph Calculated | 30.1s99% target: 403 km/h / 250 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.4s | 1.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 6.1s | 4.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.3s Calculated | 1.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 35.2L/100 km6.7mpg US8.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 9.3s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 752hp/t561kW/t341hp/1000 lb Calculated | 760hp/t567kW/t345hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton Calculated | 597Nm/t399lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 444km276mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 7,993cc488cu in | 2,880cc176cu in |
| Length | 4,544mm179in | - |
| Width | 2,038mm80in | - |
| Height | 1,212mm48in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,711mm107in | - |
| Front track | 1,749mm69in | - |
| Rear track | 1,661mm65in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 516g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16: Power / Torque
- Czinger 21C 2.9 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 6,700 rpm | 2,000-6,000 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 10,500 rpm | - | 11,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | Czinger21C2.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.3 s | 1.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.4 s | 1.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 6.1 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 14.6 s | 10.3 s |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 407 km/h 253 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.2 s | 3.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.2 s | 5.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.3 s | 8.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 259 km/h 161 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW |
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 950 hp 708 kW |
Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16 has 550 hp more than Czinger 21C 2.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 and Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16: 550 hp (410 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft |
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 746 Nm 550 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 407 km/h 253 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 2.4 s |
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 1.9 s |
Although Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16 has more power, Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 and Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 760 hp/t 567 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | 2.4 s | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 950 hp 708 kW | 1.9 s | 407 km/h 253 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | Czinger21C2.9 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | 950 hp 708 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft | 746 Nm 550 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.4 s | 1.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 407 km/h 253 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 444 km 276 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 516 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 760 hp/t 567 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 22.5 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 39.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 63.37 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,375 L892 US gal742 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,906 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16
- Has 550 hp more
- Has 854 Nm more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Czinger 21C 2.9 V8
- Is 745 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























