Bugatti Chiron
Car comparison
Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16vsBugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBugatti Centodieci
8.0 W16
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.4 s
- Fastest top speed420 km/h261 mph
- Highest torque1,600 Nm1,180 lb-ft
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
- Most powerful1,600 hp1,193 kW
- Best power-to-weight802 hp/t598 kW/t1.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption21.5 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range465 km289 mi
- Best economy score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,500hp1,119kW | 1,600hp1,193kW |
| Torque | 1,600Nm1,180lb-ft | 1,600Nm1,180lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 50.5s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph Calculated | 44.2s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.4s | 2.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 6.1s | 6.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.3s Calculated | 2.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | 21.5L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 35.2L/100 km6.7mpg US8.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 9.3s Calculated | 9.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 752hp/t561kW/t341hp/1000 lb Calculated | 802hp/t598kW/t364hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton Calculated | 802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 444km276mi Calculated | 465km289mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 7,993cc488cu in | 7,993cc488cu in |
| Length | 4,544mm179in | 4,665mm184in |
| Width | 2,038mm80in | 2,020mm80in |
| Height | 1,212mm48in | 1,215mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,711mm107in | 2,711mm107in |
| Front track | 1,749mm69in | 1,749mm69in |
| Rear track | 1,661mm65in | 1,666mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 125mm5in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | 516g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16: Power / Torque
- Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 6,700 rpm | 2,000-6,000 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 7,050-7,100 rpm | 2,250-7,000 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 14.6 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.3 s | 9.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 259 km/h 161 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW |
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 has 100 hp more than Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16.
The biggest power difference is between Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16 and Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 2.4 s |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 2.4 s |
Although Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 has more power, Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 and Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 802 hp/t 598 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 444 km 276 mi |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 465 km 289 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | 2.4 s | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW | 2.4 s | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 |
| 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 |
| 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK | 2.4 s |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | 2.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 802 hp/t 598 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16 | BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK | 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 444 km 276 mi | 465 km 289 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 516 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 802 hp/t 598 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16 | Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 22.5 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK | 21.5 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 39.38 LC100 km | 37.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 63.37 LC100 mi | 60.55 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,375 L892 US gal742 UK gal | 3,225 L852 US gal709 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,906 LC/year | 5,644 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
- Has 100 hp more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 21 km (13 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























