Bugatti Chiron
Car comparison
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16vsKoenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKoenigsegg Agera
R 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8
- Lightest1,435 kg3,164 lb
- Best power-to-weight794 hp/t592 kW/t1.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range544 km338 mi
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score67/100
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed420 km/h261 mph
- Most powerful1,500 hp1,119 kW
- Highest torque1,600 Nm1,180 lb-ft
- Best overall score75/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,500hp1,119kW | 1,140hp850kW |
| Torque | 1,600Nm1,180lb-ft | 1,200Nm885lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 1,435kg3,164lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.7s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph Calculated | 79.5s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 6.5s | 7.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 35.2L/100 km6.7mpg US8.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 9.6s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 752hp/t561kW/t341hp/1000 lb Calculated | 794hp/t592kW/t360hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton Calculated | 836Nm/t560lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 444km276mi Calculated | 544km338mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 7,993cc488cu in | 5,032cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,544mm179in | 4,293mm169in |
| Width | 2,038mm80in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,212mm48in | 1,120mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,711mm107in | 2,662mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,700mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 100mm4in |
| Trunk volume | - | 120L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 516g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16: Power / Torque
- Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 6,700 rpm | 2,000-6,000 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 6.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 15.9 s | 20.3 s |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.1 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.6 s | 10.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 252 km/h 157 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 1,140 hp 850 kW |
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16 has 360 hp more than Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8 and Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16: 360 hp (268 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 1,200 Nm 885 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 420 km/h 261 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 2.5 s |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16 and Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8 and Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16: 7.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 794 hp/t 592 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 444 km 276 mi |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 544 km 338 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | 2.5 s | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 1,140 hp 850 kW | 2.8 s | 420 km/h 261 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 |
| 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK | 2.5 s |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK |
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 794 hp/t 592 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | 1,140 hp 850 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft | 1,200 Nm 885 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 420 km/h 261 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 444 km 276 mi | 544 km 338 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 516 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 794 hp/t 592 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16 | Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 22.5 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 39.38 LC100 km | 25.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 63.37 LC100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,375 L892 US gal742 UK gal | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,906 LC/year | 3,859 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16
- Has 360 hp more
- Has 400 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8
- Is 560 kg lighter
- Uses 7.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























