Car comparison

Czinger 21C 2.9 V8vsBugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Czinger 21C

2.9 V8

950 hp2880 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2020-present
VS

Bugatti Centodieci

8.0 W16

1600 hp7993 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2022-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Czinger 21C 2.9 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    1.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    407 km/h
    253 mph
  • Lightest
    1,250 kg
    2,756 lb
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    97/100

Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16

  • Most powerful
    1,600 hp
    1,193 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,600 Nm
    1,180 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    802 hp/t
    598 kW/t
    1.2 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    49/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCzinger21C2.9 V8BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Power
950hp708kW
1,600hp1,193kW
Torque
746Nm550lb-ft
1,600Nm1,180lb-ft
Curb weight
1,250kg2,756lb
1,995kg4,398lb
Top speed
407 km/h
253 mph
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
30.1s99% target: 403 km/h / 250 mph
Calculated
44.2s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
1.9s
2.4s
0-200 km/h
4.5s
Calculated
6.1s
0-60 mph
1.8s
Calculated
2.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
21.5L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.3s
Calculated
9.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
760hp/t567kW/t345hp/1000 lb
Calculated
802hp/t598kW/t364hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
597Nm/t399lb-ft/ton
Calculated
802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
465km289mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,880cc176cu in
7,993cc488cu in
Length-
4,665mm184in
Width-
2,020mm80in
Height-
1,215mm48in
Wheelbase-
2,711mm107in
Front track-
1,749mm69in
Rear track-
1,666mm66in
Ground clearance-
125mm5in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank-
100L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Czinger 21C 2.9 V8Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16PowerTorque
  • Czinger 21C 2.9 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Czinger21C2.9 V810,500 rpm-11,000 rpm
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W167,050-7,100 rpm2,250-7,000 rpm7,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCzinger21C2.9 V8BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.8 s
2.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
1.9 s
2.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.5 s
6.1 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
10.3 s
15.3 s
Top speed
407 km/h
253 mph
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.7 s
330 ft
101 m
3.8 s
4.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.6 s
6.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.1 s
7.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.3 s
9.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
291 km/h
181 mph
258 km/h
160 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V8
950 hp
708 kW
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,600 hp
1,193 kW

Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 has 650 hp more than Czinger 21C 2.9 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 and Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: 650 hp (485 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V8
746 Nm
550 lb-ft
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V8
1,250 kg
2,756 lb
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,995 kg
4,398 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V8
407 km/h
253 mph
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V81.9 s
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W162.4 s

Although Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 has more power, Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 and Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V8
760 hp/t
567 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
802 hp/t
598 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Czinger21C2.9 V8
950 hp
708 kW
1.9 s
407 km/h
253 mph
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,600 hp
1,193 kW
2.4 s
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Czinger21C2.9 V8
Power
950 hp
708 kW
0-100 km/h1.9 s
Top speed
407 km/h
253 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Power
1,600 hp
1,193 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,665 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,215 mm
47.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCzinger21C2.9 V8BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Power
950 hp
708 kW
1,600 hp
1,193 kW
Torque
746 Nm
550 lb-ft
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft
Acceleration
1.9 s
2.4 s
Top speed
407 km/h
253 mph
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Lightness
1,250 kg
2,756 lb
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
Fuel consumption
-
21.5 L/100 km
10.9 mpg US
13.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,665 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,215 mm
47.8 in
Range score
-
465 km
289 mi
Power-to-weight score
760 hp/t
567 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
802 hp/t
598 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
Consumption21.5 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km37.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi60.55 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used3,225 L852 US gal709 UK gal
Annual fuel cost5,644 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Czinger 21C 2.9 V8

  • Is 745 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power

Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16

  • Has 650 hp more
  • Has 854 Nm more
  • Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Czinger 21C 2.9 V8
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 vs Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 - car comparison - FastVsFaster