Czinger 21C
Car comparison
Czinger 21C 2.9 V8vsBugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBugatti Centodieci
8.0 W16
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Czinger 21C 2.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h1.9 s
- Fastest top speed407 km/h253 mph
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score97/100
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
- Most powerful1,600 hp1,193 kW
- Highest torque1,600 Nm1,180 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight802 hp/t598 kW/t1.2 kg/hp
- Best economy score49/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Czinger21C2.9 V8 | BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 950hp708kW | 1,600hp1,193kW |
| Torque | 746Nm550lb-ft | 1,600Nm1,180lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,250kg2,756lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 407 km/h 253 mph | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 30.1s99% target: 403 km/h / 250 mph Calculated | 44.2s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 1.9s | 2.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 4.5s Calculated | 6.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 1.8s Calculated | 2.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 21.5L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 8.3s Calculated | 9.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 760hp/t567kW/t345hp/1000 lb Calculated | 802hp/t598kW/t364hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 597Nm/t399lb-ft/ton Calculated | 802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 465km289mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,880cc176cu in | 7,993cc488cu in |
| Length | - | 4,665mm184in |
| Width | - | 2,020mm80in |
| Height | - | 1,215mm48in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,711mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,749mm69in |
| Rear track | - | 1,666mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 125mm5in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Czinger 21C 2.9 V8: Power / Torque
- Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 10,500 rpm | - | 11,000 rpm |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 7,050-7,100 rpm | 2,250-7,000 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Czinger21C2.9 V8 | BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 1.8 s | 2.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 1.9 s | 2.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 4.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 10.3 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | 407 km/h 253 mph | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.5 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 3.8 s | 4.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 5.6 s | 6.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.1 s | 7.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 8.3 s | 9.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 291 km/h 181 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 950 hp 708 kW |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW |
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 has 650 hp more than Czinger 21C 2.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 and Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: 650 hp (485 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 746 Nm 550 lb-ft |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 407 km/h 253 mph |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 1.9 s |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 2.4 s |
Although Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 has more power, Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 and Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 760 hp/t 567 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 802 hp/t 598 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 | 950 hp 708 kW | 1.9 s | 407 km/h 253 mph |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW | 2.4 s | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czinger21C2.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Czinger21C2.9 V8 | BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 950 hp 708 kW | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 746 Nm 550 lb-ft | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 1.9 s | 2.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 407 km/h 253 mph | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 465 km 289 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 760 hp/t 567 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 802 hp/t 598 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 21.5 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 37.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 60.55 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,225 L852 US gal709 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,644 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Czinger 21C 2.9 V8
- Is 745 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
- Has 650 hp more
- Has 854 Nm more
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























